Developers of drone detection systems for military applications, including the detection, tracking and neutralization of Group-1/2 unmanned aerial systems (UAS)
By
Dr Thomas Withington Last updated: December 4th, 2024
Challenges in Detecting, Identifying & Tracking Group-1/2 Drones
Detecting drones can be difficult with small- and medium-sized aircraft posing particular problems.
The United States’ Department of Defence (DOD) uses a classification system for drone size. Classifications are made according to the aircraft’s Maximum Take-Off Weight (MTOW), operating altitude and airspeed.
Group-1 drones have an MTOW of between 0 and 20 pounds/lbs (nine kilograms/kg), a 1,200 feet/ft (365.8metres/m) altitude and an airspeed below 100 knots (185 kilometers-per-hour).
Group-2 drones have an airspeed below 250 knots (463 km/h) and fly at altitudes below 3,500ft (1,067m). This classification of drones covers aircraft with an MTOW between 21lbs (9.5kg) and 55lbs (25kg).
The problem with Group-1/2 drones is that they can be difficult to detect, identify and track using conventional radar. As such, specialist radars for drone detection may be called for.
Small Radar Cross Sections
Many of these drones are physically small even when compared to light aircraft. They can also be constructed from materials like plastic or fiberglass which give the drone a lightweight construction. The flipside is that these materials can be bad at reflecting Radio Frequency (RF) signals back to a radar.
These two factors of non-metallic material construction and a small physical size can give a drone a small Radar Cross Section (RCS). RCS indicates how small an object seems to a radar. Much like the human eye, the smaller an object’s RCS, the harder it is for the radar to see it. Many radars have thresholds for the RCSs of the targets they detect, identify and track.
These thresholds serve a practical purpose. If a radar was tuned to detect all targets in the air within range of its antenna the radar’s processor, which determines a target’s characteristics, could become inundated. Skies are filled with flocks of birds, swarms of insects and even snow, hale and rain. All these objects can cause clutter on a radar screen.
The Problem with Clutter
Clutter may inundate a radar screen obscuring the actual target of interest to the radar operator. For example, a bird may have an RCS of 0.01 square meters. A MiG-29K (NATO reporting name Fulcrum-D) combat aircraft has an RCS of between one and 1.5 square meters. If the radar operator is looking for a MiG-29K they may tune their radar to filter out targets with RCSs of under one square meter and above two square meters. Their radar will ignore targets either side of these thresholds, allowing the operator to concentrate on their search for the MiG-29K. Some small civilian hobby drones can have RCSs equivalent to those of birds. As a result, some radars may simply ignore the drones mistaking them for birds.
A Combined Approach to Military Drone Detection
Crucially, there is no single technology which is infallible for detecting, identifying, locating and tracking a drone. Instead, passive RF sensing should be combined with other sensors like acoustics, specialist radar and optronics to ensure the highest likelihood that an errant drone does not escape unnoticed.
Airborne counter-UAS system with active radar & networked edge AI processing
Airborne counter-UAS system with active radar & networked edge AI processing
...hensive threat detection and neutralization capabilities by interfacing seamlessly with a range of... ...es it an ideal military off-the-shelf (MOTS) solution for defense forces and security agencies...
RF Cyber-Takeover C-UAS for Naval & Maritime Defense
RF Cyber-Takeover C-UAS for Naval & Maritime Defense
... the automatic detection, location, and identification of rogue drones, including pinpointing pilot... ......itime offers a scalable, low-power, and ruggedized solution to naval drone threats....
Integrated multi-sensor command & control platform for enhanced counter-drone capabilities
Integrated multi-sensor command & control platform for enhanced counter-drone capabilities
......ed for border protection, expansive military installations, and extended battlefield... ...ft response to drone threats, MSC2 intelligently selects the most appropriate sensor based on radio...
AeroVironment is introducing Titan 4, a compact and lightweight RF counter-UAS system designed to detect and neutralize small drone threats rapidly, supports mobile, dismounted, or fixed-site use
AeroVironment’s Titan 4 delivers next-gen counter-UAS capabilities in a compact, deployable system, backed by AI-driven threat detection and an expanding modular ecosystem
Defense Advancement showcases Alpine Eagle's Sentinel Counter-UAS system with active radar and networked edge AI processing for mobile convoy protection and critical infrastructure security
Anduril Industries has been awarded a $642 million contract by the U.S. Marine Corps to deliver advanced C-UAS solutions, enhancing installation defense against evolving aerial threats
ASELSAN has showcased the capabilities of its GÖKBERK mobile laser weapon system, successfully detecting, tracking, and neutralizing FPV drones in multiple operational tests
Gilat Satellite Networks is investing up to $3.5 million in Crosense, a startup developing advanced ESA-based drone detection technology to enhance security for critical infrastructure and defense
Join Global Defense Engineering ProfessionalsSign up free to DA Pro to get full website access, the weekly eBrief and exclusive event discounts.
Advancing Defense Capability Through Strategic CollaborationDefense Advancement works with major OEMs to foster collaboration and increase engagement with SMEs, to accelerate innovation and drive defense capabilities forward.
